• home
  • blog
Advice for Good

    fundraising in the 21st century: different medium, same message

    with 3 comments

    Tweet

    The fact that I’m writing this article as a blog post, then Tweeting about it and talking to people on Facebook is evidence that the way people communicate has undergone rapid and drastic changes.  The not-for-profit sector is not immune to these changes.  Online giving continues to grow faster than other any area of fundraising.  In 2010 online fundraising grew by 34.5% over 2009 and this trend is set to continue.

    source: Asthma Helper

    Just look at the menu of ways for charities to fundraise through digital channels with new technology:

    • Social media (Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, etc)
    • Charity websites
    • SMS/text giving
    • Third party online fundraising sites (Just Giving)
    • Online charity comparison sites (Charity Navigator)
    • Ebay auctions
    There’s no denying that charities that quickly adopt and lead on these new fundraising mediums will be successful at getting new supporters, while charities that resist or are slow to adopt will be left behind.
    But there is a fundamental principle that underlies all fundraising activities, new and old: relationship building.  Getting loyal and high-value donors means engaging supporters in your work through communications, site visits, updates, reports, etc.  Social media and new technology are making it easier, faster and cheaper for non-profits to connect with their current and potential donors.  While this might be a replacement for written letters and some hard-copy materials, it is certainly no substitute for engagement and personalized contact.

    Here are two recent pieces of research that emphasize the importance of engagement in the context of new technology:

    1. A study by Blackbaud found that individuals raising money on behalf of charities (e.g. through events)  that regularly use social media to communicate with their networks “increased fundraising results by up to 40%”.  This isn’t all that surprising, since an individual’s presence on social media sites means that they can quickly communicate and engage with a lots of potential and current donors/sponsors at once.  They can also send frequent messages through a number of different outlets.  The same principles apply for non-profits – they need to post regularly and build relationships with their supporters/followers/fans/etc.  It’s not enough to just set-up some accounts and leave them – people want to be part of an ongoing conversation. It’s also important to note that while social media can increase fundraising results, it doesn’t mean that all this new income will be donated via social media sites.  This other Blackbaud report shows that multichannel giving (online and offline) can significantly increase donations over a donor’s
    2. The Nonprofit Social Network Benchmark Report 2011 finds that less than 1% of non-profits surveyed have raised more than $100k via social networking sites in the last year.  Major gifts from individuals, companies, foundations, etc continue to come from old school relationship building through face-t0-face meetings, pitches, applications, and so on.  While new technologies might help to identify these prospects, the relationship building still happens mostly offline.  Let’s not forget that online fundraising still only accounts for less than 10% of all giving. 

    Non-profits should absolutely embrace social media and new technologies if they have the resources and capacity.  But there’s no getting around the fact that the most fundamental element of fundriasing is still relationship building.

    • delicious Bookmark on Delicious
    • digg Digg this post
    • google_buzz Buzz it up
    • reddit share via Reddit
    • stumble Share with Stumblers
    • rss Subscribe to the comments on this post
    • email Tell a friend

    Written by jeremy

    May 23rd, 2011 at 9:16 am

    Posted in Communications,Donors,Fundraising,Marketing,Online fundraising,Research and reports

    Tagged with charity, facebook fundraising, fundraising, networking, non-profit, online fundraising, relationship building, social media, social networking

    « capturing the ‘aha moment’ in fundraising pitches
    the ethics of fundraising »

    3 Responses to 'fundraising in the 21st century: different medium, same message'

    Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'fundraising in the 21st century: different medium, same message'.

    1. Regarding: “Non-profits that regularly use social media to communicate with supporters increased fundraising results by up to 40%.”

      Just a note that the Blackbaud study indicates that participants in peer-to-peer campaigns raise potentially 40% more than participants than do not. This is participant-driven social media use in the context of a fundraising event (run, walk, ride etc) – not a measure of an organization’s activity in social media. A huge distinction.

      Claire

      2 Jun 11 at 4:05 pm

    2. Claire, you’re absolutely right. Thanks for pointing this out. We want to be accurate when citing reports, so I’ve updated this post to make the context of the Blackbaud report clearer.

      Jeremy

      jeremy

      2 Jun 11 at 4:47 pm

    3. [...] it also shows that the amount of the average online gift is increasing.  As we discussed here, most major donors prefer to give offline, but it is curious to see that the value, as well as [...]

      is an online presence essential for nonprofits? | Advice for Good blog

      19 Sep 11 at 2:40 am

    Leave a Reply

    Contact

    see how we can help your charity or non-profit with fundraising and sustainable growth.

    send us an email at hello@advice-for-good.com

    follow Advice for Good

    Categories

    • Appeals
    • Campaigns
    • Charities
    • Communications
    • Corporate partnerships
    • Donors
    • Events
    • Fundraising
    • Grants and foundations
    • Impact
    • Impact investments
    • Income sources
    • Legacy/Planned Giving
    • Major donors
    • Marketing
    • Online fundraising
    • Philanthropy
    • Politics and government
    • Pro bono and in-kind
    • Research and reports
    • Services
    • Strategy and planning
    • Volunteers